David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
HOPOS 2 (2):205-242 (2012)
This article is intended as a contribution to the current debates about the relationship between politics and the philosophy of science in the Vienna Circle. I reconsider this issue by shifting the focus from philosophy of science as theory to philosophy of science as practice. From this perspective I take as a starting point the Vienna Circle’s scientific world-conception and emphasize its practical nature: I reinterpret its tenets as a set of recommendations that express the particular epistemological attitude in which both the Vienna Circle’s (doing) philosophy of science and its political engagement were rooted. Regarding politics, and referring to new primary sources, I reconstruct how the scientific world-conception placed the Vienna Circle within a neoliberal-socialist political network that pursued concrete political aims. In light of my reconstruction I shall argue that neither the Vienna Circle’s alleged ethical noncognitivism nor its alleged adhesion to the Weberian ideal of a value-free science rules out the possibility of ascribing to the Vienna Circle a politically engaged philosophy of science: the case of the Vienna Circle shows how philosophy of science, as a public activity, can itself become a form of political engagement, even without necessarily entailing a theory of objective values.
|Keywords||Vienna Circle political philosophy of science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maria Carla Galavotti (ed.) (2004). Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Sarah S. Richardson (2009). The Left Vienna Circle, Part 1. Carnap, Neurath, and the Left Vienna Circle Thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):14-24.
Thomas E. Uebel (2008). On the Production, History, and Aspects of the Reception of the Vienna Circle's Manifesto. Perspectives on Science 16 (1):70-102.
Thomas E. Uebel (1996). Anti-Foundationalism and the Vienna Circle's Revolution in Philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):415-440.
Daniel von Wachter (2006). Review Of: Bergmann, Gustav, Collected Works Vol. I. [REVIEW] In M. C. Galavotti (ed.), Cambridge and Vienna. Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, Vol. 12). 219-222, http://epub.ub.uni-muen.
Thomas Mormann (2012). A Virtual Debate in Exile: Cassirer and the Vienna Circle After 1933. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 16:149 - 167.
T. E. Uebel (ed.) (1991). Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Thomas Ernst Uebel (ed.) (1991). Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sarah S. Richardson (2009). The Left Vienna Circle, Part 2. The Left Vienna Circle, Disciplinary History, and Feminist Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):167-174.
Viktor Kraft (1953/1969). The Vienna Circle. New York, Greenwood Press.
Sandra G. Harding (1978). Four Contributions Values Can Make to the Objectivity of Social Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:199 - 209.
Alberto Coffa (1991). The Semantic Tradition From Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Uebel (2005). Political Philosophy of Science in Logical Empiricism: The Left Vienna Circle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):754-773.
Michael Hymers (2005). Going Around the Vienna Circle: Wittgenstein and Verification. Philosophical Investigations 28 (3):205–234.
Added to index2012-11-12
Total downloads30 ( #47,978 of 1,004,639 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #28,116 of 1,004,639 )
How can I increase my downloads?