David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 14 (3):203-218 (2008)
In his multi-faceted attack on Rawls’s account of justice, G.A. Cohen has argued that the notion of basic structure is necessarily insensitive to the importance of informal social norms to social justice. The paper argues that the most plausible account of the basic structure is not blind to informal social norms in any meaningful sense. Whereas informal, non-legally coercive institutions are not part of the basic structure as such, their careful consideration is necessary for the assessment of whether the basic structure itself is indeed just. This claim is based on an account of what it means for normative principle to apply to institutions, which I expound in detail throughout the paper. Principles apply to institutions, I argue, not in that they restrain their conduct, but in that they indicate which social conditions they should bring about.
|Keywords||John Rawls G.A. Cohen Social justice Social norms Institutional theories of justice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. A. Cohen (1997). Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3–30.
Joshua Cohen (2001). Taking People as They Are? Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (4):363–386.
David Estlund (1998). Debate: Liberalism, Equality, and Fraternity in Cohen's Critique of Rawls. Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1):99–112.
Aaron James (2005). Power in Social Organization as the Subject of Justice. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):25–49.
A. J. Julius (2003). Basic Structure and the Value of Equality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (4):321–355.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
András Miklós (2011). The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice. Utilitas 23 (2):161-182.
Robert Jubb (2011). On the Significance of the Basic Structure: A Priori Baseline Views and Luck Egalitarianism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (1):59-79.
A. Follesdal (2011). The Distributive Justice of a Global Basic Structure: A Category Mistake? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):46-65.
Xin Liu (2011). The Implication of Rawls' Approach to Public Reason. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):161-169.
Richard Arneson (2004). Egalitarianism and Responsibility. Journal of Ethics 3 (3):225-247.
Ian Hunt (2011). How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice? Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
Arash Abizadeh (2007). Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (Not Site) of Distributive Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (4):318–358.
Thomas Porter (2009). The Division of Moral Labour and the Basic Structure Restriction. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):173-199.
Blain Neufeld (2009). Coercion, the Basic Structure, and the Family. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #24,727 of 1,699,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #77,273 of 1,699,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?