How scientists really think

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 32 (4):472-488 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science.Michael Strevens - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):159-170.
The social responsibilities of biological scientists.Stanley Joel Reiser & Ruth E. Bulger - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):137-143.
Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.
Simple or Simplistic? Scientists' Views on Occam's Razor.Hauke Riesch - 2010 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 25 (1):75-90.
Civil Scientists: Dutch Scientists between 1750 and 1875.Ad Maas - 2010 - History of Science 48 (1):75-103.
What is Utility?D. W. Haslett - 1990 - Economics and Philosophy 6 (1):65.
Aesthetic cognition.Robert S. Root-Bernstein - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):61 – 77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references