Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 52 (2):313 - 323 (1982)
|Abstract||Do analogical models ever play an essential role in scientific explanation and confirmation, or is their role (at most) heuristic? For many years scientists and philosophers have debated this question. I argue that such models may sometimes play an essential role. My argument is based on a proposal to augment Goodman''s theory of projection in order to make it easier for novel predicates (extensions) to acquire entrenchment. The heart of this proposal is the claim that analogical models may, under certain conditions, be the medium whereby entrenchment is passed from well established predicates to new and unfamiliar ones.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hans Rott (2003). Basic Entrenchment. Studia Logica 73 (2):257 - 280.
Stephan Hartmann & Roman Frigg (2006). Models in Science. In Ed Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford.
Gabriele Gramelsberger (2011). What Do Numerical (Climate) Models Really Represent? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):296-302.
James Horgan (1994). Icon and Bild: A Note on the Analogical Structure of Models--The Role of Models in Experiment and Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):599-604.
Mary S. Morgan (1997). The Technology of Analogical Models: Irving Fisher's Monetary Worlds. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):314.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?