Analogy as a Rule of Meaning for Religious Language
International Philosophical Quarterly 1 (3):468-502 (1961)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames F. Ross (1981). Portraying Analogy. Cambridge University Press.
Roger M. White (2009). Talking About God: The Concept of Analogy and the Problem of Religious Language. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Graeme Marshall (2012). The Problem of Religious Language 'Look at It This Way' (Wittgenstein). Sophia 51 (4):479-493.
David Pears (forthcoming). Rule-Following in Philosophical Investigations. Grazer Philosophische Studien:249-261.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Jeffrey Hershfield (2005). Rule Following and the Background. Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):269 - 280.
Anthony Kenny (1976). Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Daniel Whiting (2010). Particular and General: Wittgenstein, Linguistic Rules, and Context. In Daniel Whiting (ed.), The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nuel D. Belnap (1982). Gupta's Rule of Revision Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1):103-116.
J. N. Findlay (1948). Recommendations Regarding the Language of Introspection. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (December):212-236.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads3 ( #201,695 of 548,974 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,974 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
