David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 37 (02):294- (1987)
Athenians of the fifth and fourth centuries claimed with pride that their ancestors had always lived in Attica, a claim which they expressed by describing themselves as Related to this Athenian belief that they had always lived in Attica was a second, that, as a people, they were literally ‘sprung from the earth’. It is generally assumed that both beliefs developed at a very early date, but this is merely an assumption, and in the course of this paper we will see evidence suggesting, to the contrary, that both ideas were relatively late developments. This paper focuses on the development of the concept of autochthony, as far as our sources allow, in an effort to understand better what autochthony meant to the Athenians. In particular it considers how the Athenians came to think of themselves as ‘born from the earth’. It then suggests how, through the medium of the word the idea of being ‘born from the earth’ came to symbolize ‘living in a place from time immemorial’. Finally it examines how the concept of autochthony was used in contexts which relate it to the ideology of Athenian democracy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
D. M. Lewis (1969). A Loeb Constitution of the Athenians Xenophon with an English Translation. Volume Vii.: Scripta Minora by E. C. Marchant; Pseudo-Xenophon, Constitution of the Athenians, by G. W. Bowersock. (Loeb Classical Library). Pp. Xlvii+515. London: Heinemann, 1968. Cloth, 25s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 19 (01):45-47.
B. B. de La Perriere (1996). The Burmese Nats: Between Sovereignty and Autochthony. Diogenes 44 (174):45-60.
Christopher Pelling (2009). Bringing Autochthony Up-to-Date: Herodotus and Thucydides. Classical World 102 (4):471-483.
Edith Wyschogrod (2005). Autochthony and Welcome: Discourses of Exile in Lévinas and Derrida. In Yvonne Sherwood & Kevin Hart (eds.), Journal of Philosophy and Scripture. Routledge.
H. D. Westlake (1966). The Athenians in Sicily. The Classical Review 16 (01):26-.
H. D. Westlake (1969). Theopompus V. The Old Athenians. The Classical Review 19 (03):281-.
D. M. Lewis (1969). A Loeb Constitution of the Athenians. The Classical Review 19 (01):45-.
R. E. Macnaghten (1907). Character and Language of the Athenians. The Classical Review 21 (01):12-14.
D. H. Kelly (1970). What Happened to the Athenians Captured in Sicily? The Classical Review 20 (02):127-131.
Gerald Bechtle (1996). A Note On Pseudo-Xenophon, The Constitution of the Athenians 1.11. Classical Quarterly 46 (02):564-.
Edward M. Harris (1990). Did the Athenians Regard Seduction as a Worse Crime Than Rape? Classical Quarterly 40 (02):370-.
Timothy A. Mahoney (1998). Socrates' Loyalty to Athens and His Radical Critique of the Athenians. History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (1):1 - 22.
E. M. Walker (1927). The Old Oligarch, Being the Constitution of the Athenians Ascribed to Xenophon. By J. A. Petch. Pp. 29. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Is. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (04):154-.
Scott Meikle (1989). Ordinary Athenians Ellen Meiksins Wood: Peasant-Citizen and Slave: The Foundations of Athenian Democracy. Pp. X + 210. London and New York: Verso, 1988. £22.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):278-279.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads19 ( #102,861 of 1,689,222 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #112,061 of 1,689,222 )
How can I increase my downloads?