Cantor on Frege's Foundations of Arithmetic : Cantor's 1885 Review of Frege's Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (4):341-348 (2010)
In 1885, Georg Cantor published his review of Gottlob Frege's Grundlagen der Arithmetik . In this essay, we provide its first English translation together with an introductory note. We also provide a translation of a note by Ernst Zermelo on Cantor's review, and a new translation of Frege's brief response to Cantor. In recent years, it has become philosophical folklore that Cantor's 1885 review of Frege's Grundlagen already contained a warning to Frege. This warning is said to concern the defectiveness of Frege's notion of extension. The exact scope of such speculations varies and sometimes extends as far as crediting Cantor with an early hunch of the paradoxical nature of Frege's notion of extension. William Tait goes even further and deems Frege 'reckless' for having missed Cantor's explicit warning regarding the notion of extension. As such, Cantor's purported inkling would have predated the discovery of the Russell-Zermelo paradox by almost two decades. In our introductory essay, we discuss this alleged implicit (or even explicit) warning, separating two issues: first, whether the most natural reading of Cantor's criticism provides an indication that the notion of extension is defective; second, whether there are other ways of understanding Cantor that support such an interpretation and can serve as a precisification of Cantor's presumed warning
|Keywords||Gottlob Frege Georg Cantor Philosophy of Mathematics Set-theoretic paradoxes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
R. Cook (2003). Iteration One More Time. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (2):63--92.
Georg Cantor, Richard Dedekind & Abraham Adolf Fraenkel (1966). Gesammelte Abhandlungen Mathematischen Und Philosophischen Inhalts. Gg Olms.
George Boolos (1989). Iteration Again. Philosophical Topics 17 (2):5-21.
Citations of this work BETA
J. J. Green, Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert (2015). The Convenience of the Typesetter; Notation and Typography in Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (1):15-30.
Similar books and articles
Matthias Schirn (2011). On Translating Frege's Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):47-72.
J. Ferreiros (2004). The Motives Behind Cantor’s Set Theory: Physical, Biological and Philosophical Questions. Science in Context 17 (1/2):1–35.
Kevin C. Klement (2010). Russell, His Paradoxes, and Cantor's Theorem: Part I. Philosophy Compass 5 (1):16-28.
Anne Newstead (2009). Cantor on Infinity in Nature, Number, and the Divine Mind. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):533-553.
Christopher Menzel (1984). Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox. The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Added to index2010-05-30
Total downloads425 ( #4,368 of 1,902,527 )
Recent downloads (6 months)79 ( #3,447 of 1,902,527 )
How can I increase my downloads?