Church's thesis: What its difficulties are and are not
Journal of Philosophy 71 (15):515-525 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEli Dresner (2008). Turing-, Human- and Physical Computability: An Unasked Question. Minds and Machines 18 (3).
Gualtiero Piccinini (2007). Computationalism, the Church–Turing Thesis, and the Church–Turing Fallacy. Synthese 154 (1):97-120.
John T. Kearns (1997). Thinking Machines: Some Fundamental Confusions. Minds and Machines 7 (2):269-87.
Paolo Cotogno (2003). Hypercomputation and the Physical Church-Turing Thesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):181-223.
Tim Button (2009). Sad Computers and Two Versions of the Church–Turing Thesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):765-792.
Carol Cleland (2006). The Church-Turing Thesis: A Last Vestige of a Failed Mathematical Program. In A. Olszewski, J. Wole'nski & R. Janusz (eds.), Church's Thesis After Seventy Years. Ontos Verlag.
Selmer Bringsjord & Konstantine Arkoudas (2006). On the Provability, Veracity, and AI-Relevance of the Church-Turing Thesis. In A. Olszewski, J. Wole'nski & R. Janusz (eds.), Church's Thesis After Seventy Years. Ontos Verlag.
B. Jack Copeland (2008). The Church-Turing Thesis. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Robert Black (2000). Proving Church's Thesis. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):244--58.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
