David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The administrators of the human genome project were eager to stimulate public discussion, academic debate, legal and legislative deliberation of how individuals and institutions should respond to the revolution in genomics. Paramount among the issues whose discussion they encouraged are three obvious matters: The threat which access to our genetic information poses for heath insurance, employment, and social discrimination the nefarious consequences for scientific advance of turning basic scientific discoveries about genomes into private property The permissibility of prenatal genetic screening, germline therapy, cloning and other in- vitro reproductive processes. It should not be surprising that there is a great deal of uniformity of views about most of the problems that come under these three headings. For they do not raise issues different in kind from those we faced in bioethics before the genomic revolution. Even starting from divergent moral theories, by and large people have come to broadly similar conclusions about which newly available choices are morally permissible and which are not. Our moral intuitions and articulated moral theory have stood us in good stead, providing substantial grounds for disapproving new genomically inspired examples of old practices–like eugenics, the paternalism of health-care experts, and the sacrifice of individual rights to..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ruth Chadwick (2011). Personal Genomes: No Bad News? Bioethics 25 (2):62-65.
Ruth Chadwick & Sarah Wilson (2004). Genomic Databases as Global Public Goods? Res Publica 10 (2):123-134.
Rachelle D. Hollander (2002). Social Genomics: Genomic Inventions in Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):485-496.
Ernesto Schwartz-Marín & Irma Silva-Zolezzi (2010). The Map of the Mexican’s Genome”: Overlapping National Identity, and Population Genomics. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):489-514.
John Dupré (2004). Understanding Contemporary Genomics. Perspectives on Science 12 (3):320-338.
Michael M. Burgess (2004). Public Consultation in Ethics an Experiment in Representative Ethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1 (1):4-13.
Amy Paul (2011). Growing Respect for Opposition. Hastings Center Report 41 (3):17-19.
Stephen Wilkinson (2007). Eugenics and the Criticism of Bioethics. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):409 - 418.
Dagmar Schmitz (2013). A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Marko Barendregt & René Van Hezewijk (2005). Adaptive and Genomic Explanations of Human Behaviour: Might Evolutionary Psychology Contribute to Behavioural Genomics? [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 20 (1):57-78.
Eli Feiring (2009). Reassessing Insurers' Access to Genetic Information: Genetic Privacy, Ignorance, and Injustice. Bioethics 23 (5):300-310.
Jordan Bartol (2013). Re-Examining the Gene in Personalized Genomics. Science and Education 22 (10):2529-2546.
Lewis Vaughn (2010). Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases. Oxford University Press.
Rosamond Rhodes (1998). Genetic Links, Family Ties, and Social Bonds: Rights and Responsibilities in the Face of Genetic Knowledge. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1):10 – 30.
Anita Silvers & Michael Ashley Stein (2003). Human Rights and Genetic Discrimination: Protecting Genomics'Promise For Public Health. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):377-389.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads12 ( #150,141 of 1,692,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #57,656 of 1,692,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?