Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy Compass 7 (9):643-653 (2012)
|Abstract||Empirical research has recently emerged as a key method for understanding the nature of causation, and our concept of causation. One thread of research aims to test intuitions about the nature of causation in a variety of classic cases. These experiments have principally been used to try to resolve certain debates within analytic philosophy, most notably that between proponents of transference and dependence views of causation. The other major thread of empirical research on our concept of causation has investigated the role that normative considerations play in causal judgments. These experimental results suggest that philosophical accounts of our concept of causation should take a broader view of what might be relevant. For both lines of research, we describe some of the significant experiments and outline key philosophical morals that have been drawn, all while pointing out various limitations. We conclude by considering other kinds of empirical research that should be philosophically interesting for those studying the nature of causation and our concept of causation. In particular, we point towards the need for philosophical research about causal perception, causal reasoning, and causal learning, as well as ways in which this research could play a role in prescriptive metaphysics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eleni Papaoikonomou, Gerard Ryan & Mireia Valverde (2011). Mapping Ethical Consumer Behavior: Integrating the Empirical Research and Identifying Future Directions. Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):197 - 221.
Kourken Michaelian & John Sutton (2013). Distributed Cognition and Memory Research: History and Current Directions. [REVIEW] Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (1):1-24.
Diana C. Robertson (1993). Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (8):585 - 599.
Michael J. O.’Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield (2005). A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):375 - 413.
Michael J. O'Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield (2005). A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996-2003. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):375 - 413.
Maria S. Zaragoza & Karen J. Mitchell (1995). Empirical Psychology and the Repressed Memory Debate: Current Status and Future Directions. Consciousness and Cognition 4 (1):116-119.
David Danks, David Rose & Edouard Machery (forthcoming). Demoralizing Causation. Philosophical Studies.
M. S. Singer (1998). Paradigms Linked. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):481-496.
Hanoch Ben-Yami (2007). The Impossibility of Backwards Causation. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):439–455.
Scott J. Vitell (2003). Consumer Ethics Research: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for the Future. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):33 - 47.
Douglas Kutach (2009). Empirical Analyses of Causation. In Allan Hazlett (ed.), New Waves in Metaphysics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Thomas D. Bontly (2006). What is an Empirical Analysis of Causation? Synthese 151 (2):177 - 200.
Graham Oddie (1990). Backwards Causation and the Permanence of the Past. Synthese 85 (1):71 - 93.
Added to index2012-03-14
Total downloads184 ( #2,133 of 755,029 )
Recent downloads (6 months)76 ( #443 of 755,029 )
How can I increase my downloads?