|Abstract||In the traditional logic of the syllogism, Aristotelian logic, there are four kinds of syllogisms, Darapti, Felapton, Bramantip, and Fesapo, that are often said to be invalid in modern logic. Elementary logic students may even simply be told that they really are invalid. This is, of course, a distortion; but it is instructive to consider why this has happened and why it is that the syllogisms are considered invalid.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Araceli C. Hidalgo (1985). H.P. Grice's Defense of the Two-Valued Formal System of Classical Logic: A Critique. Asian Center, University of the Philippines.
Lothar Philipps (1999). Approximate Syllogisms – on the Logic of Everyday Life. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3).
Peter Kreeft (2005). Socratic Logic. St. Augustine's Press.
Susanne Bobzien (2002). The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd Century AD. Phronesis 47 (4):359-394.
Frances Howard-Snyder (2012). The Power of Logic. Mcgraw-Hill.
Edward M. Engelmann (2007). Aristotle's Syllogystic, Modern Deductive Logic, and Scientific Demonstration. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):535-552.
Susanne Bobzien (2002). The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity : From Aristotle to the 2nd Century AD. Phronesis 47 (4):359-394.
Michael Morreau (2009). The Hypothetical Syllogism. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (4):447 - 464.
Colwyn Williamson (1988). How Many Syllogisms Are There? History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1):77-85.
Charles Turek (1975). Lehmann on the Rules of the Invalid Syllogisms. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16 (4):603-604.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?