Graduate studies at Western
Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 24 (2):147-168 (2009)
|Abstract||It is often claimed that nominalistic programmes to reconstruct mathematics fail, since they will at some point involve the notion of logical consequence which is unavailable to the nominalist. In this paper we use an idea of Goodman and Quine to develop a nominalistically acceptable explication of logical consequence|
|Keywords||Philosophy of mathematics nominalism logical consequence inferentialism Nelson Goodman W.V. Quine|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ignacio Jane (1997). Theoremhood and Logical Consequence. Theoria 12 (1):139-160.
William H. Hanson (1999). Ray on Tarski on Logical Consequence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):605-616.
Jared Bates (1999). Etchemendy, Tarski, and Logical Consequence. Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1):47-54.
Torsten Wilholt (2006). Think About the Consequences! Nominalism and the Argument From the Philosophy of Logic. Dialectica 60 (2):115–133.
Mario Gómez-Torrente (2003). Logical Consequence and Logical Expressions. Theoria 18 (2):131-144.
Matthew W. McKeon (2010). The Concept of Logical Consequence: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. Peter Lang Pub..
Pablo Cobreros (2008). Supervaluationism and Logical Consequence: A Third Way. Studia Logica 90 (3):291 - 312.
Daniel Cohnitz (2009). Logical Consequence for Nominalists. Theoria 24 (2):147-168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,328 of 741,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,338 of 741,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?