Hypatia 17 (3):200 - 213 (2002)
|Abstract||In this commentary on Eva Feder Kittay's Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency, I focus on Kittay's dependency theory. I apply this theory to an analysis of women's inadequate access to high-quality, cost-effective healthcare. I conclude that while quandaries remain unresolved, including getting men to do their share of dependency work, Kittay's book is an important and original contribution to feminist healthcare ethics and the development of a normative feminist ethic of care|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Belinda Bennett & Isabel Karpin (2008). Regulatory Options for Gender Equity in Health Research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):80 - 99.
Asha Bhandary (2010). Dependency in Justice: Can Rawlsian Liberalism Accommodate Kittay's Dependency Critique? Hypatia 25 (1):140-156.
Carla Saenz (2011). Affordability of Health Care: A Gender-Related Problem and a Gender-Responsive Solution. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2).
Martha Nussbaum (2002). Introduction to the Symposium on Eva Kittay's Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. Hypatia 17 (3):194-199.
Eva Feder Kittay (1995). Taking Dependency Seriously: The Family and Medical Leave Act Considered in Light of the Social Organization of Dependency Work and Gender Equality. Hypatia 10 (1):8 - 29.
Shiloh Y. Whitney (2011). Dependency Relations: Corporeal Vulnerability and Norms of Personhood in Hobbes and Kittay. Hypatia 26 (3):554-574.
Sara Ruddick (2002). An Appreciation of Love's Labor. Hypatia 17 (3):214 - 224.
Eva Kittay (2002). Love's Labor Revisited. Hypatia 17 (3):237 - 250.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads6 ( #145,458 of 548,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?