- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Love, Power and Knowledge; Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Love, Power, and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences by Hilary Rose. [REVIEW]Pat Spallone - 1995 - Isis 86:359-360.
Love Power and Knowledge: Towards a Feministic Transformation of Sciences.Rose Hilary & Joop Schopman - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (1).
Feminist theory in science: Working toward a practical transformation.Deboleena Roy - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):255-279.
Towards a Transformational Political Concept of Love in Critical Education.Maija Lanas & Michalinos Zembylas - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 34 (1):31-44.
The power of feminist theory: domination, resistance, solidarity.Amy Allen - 1999 - Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Love – exploitable resource or ‘No-lose situation’? : Reconciling Jónasdóttir’s feminist view with Bhaskar’s philosophy of meta-reality.Lena Gunnarsson - 2011 - Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):419-441.
Mysticism: The Transformation of a Love Consumed by Desire into a Love without Desire.Paul Moyaert - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2):281-294.
Feminist questions, Marx's method and the theorisation of "love power".Anna G. Jónasdóttir - 2008 - In Anna G. Jónasdóttir & Kathleen B. Jones (eds.), The Political Interests of Gender Revisited: Redoing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. United Nations University Press.
Scientific knowledge and its situatedness versus its objectivity (problems of situated knowledge in feminist epistemology).E. Farkasova - 2002 - Filozofia 57 (6):383-392.
Beyond masculinist realities: A feminist epistemology for the sciences.Hilary Rose - 1986 - In Ruth Bleier (ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science. Pergamon Press. pp. 57--76.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-04
Downloads
1 (#1,886,728)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
2015-02-04
Downloads
1 (#1,886,728)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
What is a Woman? Butler and Beauvoir on the Foundations of the Sexual Difference.Sara Heinämaa - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (1):20-39.
A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory's controversiality.Sandra Harding - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):25-47.
Experimental Design: Ethics, Integrity and the Scientific Method.Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - In Ron Iphofen (ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Cham, Switzerland: pp. 459-474.
A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources from Standpoint Theory's Controversiality.Sandra Harding - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):25-47.
Feminist perspectives on science.Alison Wylie, Elizabeth Potter & Wenda K. Bauchspies - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo