David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 27 (3):245-263 (2005)
Our primal ability to see one thing in terms of another shapes our landscape perception. Although modes of appreciation are tied to personal interests and situations, there are many lines of conflict and incompatibility between these modes. A religious point of view is unacceptable to those without religious beliefs. Background knowledge is similarly required for taking an arts or science-based view of landscape, although this knowledge can be acquired. How to cultivate responses grounded in imagination, emotion, and instinct is less clear, but advocates are eager to spell out notions of virtuous exercise and effective schooling. Carlson’s science-based theory often gets the most attention because he has refined and defended it over many years, but there is a place in aesthetic nature appreciation for the formal or design elements he dismisses as well as for religious, imaginative, emotional, and ambient responses. To date, the normative aspects of these theories have been presented sketchily at best. Working out these details will chart a way for landscape appreciation to become politically correct
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
H. V. S. Ogden (1955). English Taste in Landscape in the Seventeenth Century. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Landscape, Natural Beauty, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Elizabeth Wheeler Manwaring (1925/1965). Italian Landscape in Eighteenth Century England. New York, Russell & Russell.
Thomas Leddy (2005). A Defense of Arts-Based Appreciation of Nature. Environmental Ethics 27 (3):299-315.
Kate Flint & Howard Morphy (eds.) (2000). Culture, Landscape, and the Environment. Oxford University Press.
Paul Shepard (1967). Man in the Landscape. New York, Knopf; [Distributed by Random House].
Christopher W. Pawlowski (2006). Dynamic Landscapes, Stability and Ecological Modeling. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (1):43-53.
Anya Plutynski (2008). The Rise and Fall of the Adaptive Landscape? Biology and Philosophy 23 (5):605-623.
A. Lubowski-Jahn (2011). A Comparative Analysis of the Landscape Aesthetics of Alexander von Humboldt and John Ruskin. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):321-333.
Allen Carlson (2009). Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. Columbia University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #270,384 of 1,789,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?