David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialectica 60 (1):47–61 (2006)
In this paper, I present an argument for the revision of classical logic. The argument is based on the coherence of a metaethical position which is a species of agnosticism. According to this view, the debate between cognitivists and noncognitivists about moral discourse is unresolved. I argue that there is something at stake in this debate and so something one can coherently be agnostic about. The revisionary argument also draws on principles of epistemic closure. I make these principles explicit and indicate to what extent they can plausibly be assumed. The proposal to revise classical logic is likely to meet with some resistance: classical logic is too deeply entrenched in our reasoning. Before suggesting what to put in its place, I address and defuse four objections that might be levelled against the argument for its revision. I close with some general remarks on the force of arguments for logical reform
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Allan Gibbard (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Harvard University Press.
Crispin Wright (1992). Truth and Objectivity. Harvard University Press.
John Henry McDowell (1998). Mind, Value, and Reality. Harvard University Press.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1991). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Harvard University Press.
Michael D. Resnik (1997). Mathematics as a Science of Patterns. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Divers (2004). Agnosticism About Other Worlds: A New Antirealist Programme in Modality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):660–685.
J. Brown (2001). Anti-Individualism and Agnosticism. Analysis 61 (3):213-24.
Josiah Royce (1890). Dr. Abbot's "Way Out of Agnosticism":The "Way Out of Agnosticism; or, the Philosophy of Free Religion,". Francis Ellingwood Abbot. Ethics 1 (1):98-.
Frederick Rauscher (1997). How a Kantian Can Accept Evolutionary Metaethics. Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):303-326.
Graham Oppy (1994). Weak Agnosticism Defended. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (3):147 - 167.
James Ward (1915). Naturalism and Agnosticism. New York,Kraus Reprint Co..
Aaron Holland (2001). Consistency in Presuming Agnosticism. Philo 4 (1):82-89.
Sven Rosenkranz (2003). Wright on Vagueness and Agnosticism. Mind 112 (447):449-464.
Sven Rosenkranz (2007). Agnosticism as a Third Stance. Mind 116 (461):55-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #118,506 of 1,934,362 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,883 of 1,934,362 )
How can I increase my downloads?