David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):314-349 (2008)
In his critique of egoism as a doctrine of ends, G. E. Moore famously challenges the idea that something can be someone. Donald Regan has recently revived and developed the Moorean challenge, making explicit its implications for the very idea of individual welfare. If the Moorean is right, there is no distinct, normative property good for, and so no plausible objectivism about ethics could be welfarist. In this essay, I undertake to address the Moorean challenge, clarifying our theoretical alternatives so that we may better decide what to admit into our moral ontology and better assess what may be at stake in whether objectivists treat good or good for (or neither) as fundamental. I compare the Moorean and welfarist pictures of value, providing an account of the form and function of good for. According to this account expresses a distinct relational value that has its source in the value of persons. Good for value is thus a form of extrinsic value that provides agent-neutral reasons for action, and it plays a pervasive normative role in regulating child rearing, guiding individual life choices, and shaping social policy formation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen (2009). On for Someone's Sake Attitudes. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):397 - 411.
Connie S. Rosati (2013). The Story of a Life. Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):21-50.
Similar books and articles
Roger Strand (2011). Health Ideologies, Objectivism, and the Common Good: On the Rights of Dissidents. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):605-611.
Don Dedrick (1995). Objectivism and the Evolutionary Value of Color Vision. Dialogue 34 (1):35-44.
Edward Wilson Averill & Allan Hazlett (2011). Color Objectivism and Color Projectivism. Philosophical Psychology 24 (6):751 - 765.
Albert Ellis (1968). Is Objectivism a Religion? New York, L. Stuart.
Kenneth J. Gergen (2009). Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford University Press.
Michael Byron (2000). Virtue and the Reductivist Challenge. Contemporary Philosophy 22:34-41.
Leonard Peikoff (2012). Understanding Objectivism: A Guide to Learning Ayn Rand's Philosophy of Objectivism. New American Library.
Connie S. Rosati (2009). Relational Good and the Multiplicity Problem. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):205-234.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #52,346 of 1,707,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #266,402 of 1,707,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?