Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):314-349 (2008)
|Abstract||In his critique of egoism as a doctrine of ends, G. E. Moore famously challenges the idea that something can be someone. Donald Regan has recently revived and developed the Moorean challenge, making explicit its implications for the very idea of individual welfare. If the Moorean is right, there is no distinct, normative property good for, and so no plausible objectivism about ethics could be welfarist. In this essay, I undertake to address the Moorean challenge, clarifying our theoretical alternatives so that we may better decide what to admit into our moral ontology and better assess what may be at stake in whether objectivists treat good or good for (or neither) as fundamental. I compare the Moorean and welfarist pictures of value, providing an account of the form and function of good for. According to this account expresses a distinct relational value that has its source in the value of persons. Good for value is thus a form of extrinsic value that provides agent-neutral reasons for action, and it plays a pervasive normative role in regulating child rearing, guiding individual life choices, and shaping social policy formation|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roger Strand (2011). Health Ideologies, Objectivism, and the Common Good: On the Rights of Dissidents. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):605-611.
Don Dedrick (1995). Objectivism and the Evolutionary Value of Color Vision. Dialogue 34 (1):35-44.
Edward Wilson Averill & Allan Hazlett (2011). Color Objectivism and Color Projectivism. Philosophical Psychology 24 (6):751 - 765.
Albert Ellis (1968). Is Objectivism a Religion? New York, L. Stuart.
Kenneth J. Gergen (2009). Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford University Press.
Leonard Peikoff (2012). Understanding Objectivism: A Guide to Learning Ayn Rand's Philosophy of Objectivism. New American Library.
Connie S. Rosati (2009). Relational Good and the Multiplicity Problem. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):205-234.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #34,681 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?