Odi et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature
Hobbes Studies 24 (1):91-111 (2011)
| Abstract | Very few—if any—will doubt Hobbes's aversion to the state of nature and sympathy for civil society. On the other hand, it is not quite news that it would be inaccurate to claim that Hobbes rejected the state of nature entirely. Indeed, he embraced or at the very least tolerated the state of nature at the international level in order to escape from the individual state of nature. Hobbes's recommended exchange of an individual state of nature for an international one does seem to have a smack of contradiction, arguably first noted by Rousseau. There is yet another charge of contradiction lurking around Hobbes's account of the state of nature. Hobbes's political thought would still reflect an ambivalent attitude towards a third instantiation of the state of nature, i.e. civil war. This is one of the main reasons why the political allegiance of Thomas Hobbes has been an issue ever since the publication of De Cive at the very least. This paper deals with Hobbes's differential treatment of the original and the international states of nature and discusses the source of Hobbes's somewhat ambivalent attitude towards civil war. It is here argued that Hobbes can fairly hold his ground vis-à-vis Rousseau's criticism, in spite of the normative resemblance between the international state of nature and the initial state of nature, and that Hobbes ambivalent attitude of attraction and repulsion towards civil war is actually due not so much to opportunism on his part as to the normative autonomy he has granted to the state of nature | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHelen Thornton (2005). State of Nature or Eden?: Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings. University of Rochester Press.
Michael Moehler (2009). Why Hobbes' State of Nature is Best Modeled by an Assurance Game. Utilitas 21 (3):297-326.
Daniel Eggers (2011). Hobbes and Game Theory Revisited: Zero-Sum Games in the State of Nature. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):193-226.
J. McKenzie Alexander (2001). Group Dynamics in the State of Nature. Erkenntnis 55 (2):169-182.
A. P. Martinich (2011). Reason and Reciprocity in Hobbes's Political Philosophy: On Sharon Lloyd's: Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):158-169.
Richard Ashcraft (1988). Political Theory and Practical Action: A Reconsideration of Hobbes's State of Nature. Hobbes Studies 1 (1):63-88.
François Tricaud (1988). Hobbes's Conception of the State of Nature From L640 to L651. In G. A. J. Rogers & Alan Ryan (eds.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford University Press.
D. Dyzenhaus (2001). Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law. Law and Philosophy 20 (5):461-498.
Susanne Sreedhar (2010). Hobbes on Resistance. Cambridge University Press.
Garrath Williams, Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sharon Anderson-Gold (2012). Philosophers of Peace: Hobbes and Kant on International Order. Hobbes Studies 25 (1):6-20.
Alexander Broadie (2013). James Dundas on the Hobbesian State of Nature. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (1):1-13.
Sergei Prozorov (2009). The Appropriation of Abandonment: Giorgio Agamben on the State of Nature and the Political. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):327-353.
Patricia Sheridan (2012). Resisting the Scaffold: Self-Preservation and Limits of Obligation in Hobbes's Leviathan. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):137-157.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-06-19Total downloads28 ( #44,113 of 549,126 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,126 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
