Re-membering

Abstract
Memory is, therefore, neither perception nor conception, but a state or affection of one of these, conditioned by lapse of time. As already observed, there is no such thing as memory of the present while present; for the present is object only of perception, and the future, of expectation, but the object of memory is the past. All memory, therefore, implies a time elapsed; consequently only those animals which perceive time remember, and the organ whereby they perceive time is also that whereby they remember. (Aristotle, OM, 449b24–30)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Charles Scott (1999). Memory of Time in the Light of Flesh. Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):421-432.
    Fabrice Teroni, The Epistemological Disunity of Memory. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.
    Tahseen Béa (2008). Memory of Touch. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:5-82.
    Arun Kumar Pokhrel (2009). Representations of Time and Memory in Holocaust Literature. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):27-37.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-02

    Total downloads

    7 ( #149,772 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    0

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.