Religious parties, religious political identity, and the cold shoulder of liberal democratic thought
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):23-53 (2003)
Elements of the relation between religion and politics are standard themes in political theory: toleration and free exercise rights; the parameters of separation of church and state; arguments for and against constraints imposed on religious discourse by philosophic norms of public reason. But religious parties and partisanship are no part of political theory, despite contemporary interest in value pluralism and in liberal democratic theory's capacity to address multicultural, religious, and ethnic group claims. This essay argues that religious parties are missing elements in discussions of identity politics. They play an important role not just in expressing but also in constructing and mobilizing religious political identity. Political activity linked to parties is a principal way of bringing diffuse, politically unorganized groups, whose leaders are self-appointed and not regularly accountable for the way they represent co-religionists in political life, into the democratic mainstream. With political organization and especially partisanship, the fact of pluralism is made concrete for democratic purposes.
|Keywords||assimilation democratic theory identity politics political identity political parties public reason religion secularization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rebecca Kook (1998). The Fact of Pluralism and Israeli National Identity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (6):1-24.
Richard L. Wood (1999). Religious Culture and Political Action. Sociological Theory 17 (3):307-332.
Lucas Swaine (2011). The Liberal Conscience: An Overview. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):505-507.
Pamela Beth Harris (2012). The Politics of Judicial Public Reason: Secular Interests and Religious Rights. [REVIEW] Philosophia 40 (2):271-283.
James Bohman (2003). Deliberative Toleration. Political Theory 31 (6):757-779.
Thomas Schmidt (1999). Religious Pluralism and Democratic Society: Political Liberalism and the Reasonableness of Religious Beliefs. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):43-56.
Veit Bader (2003). Religious Diversity and Democratic Institutional Pluralism. Political Theory 31 (2):265-294.
Simon Căbulea May (2009). Religious Democracy and the Liberal Principle of Legitimacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (2):136-170.
Matteo Bonotti (2011). Religious Political Parties and the Limits of Political Liberalism. Res Publica 17 (2):107-123.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #57,590 of 1,013,596 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,884 of 1,013,596 )
How can I increase my downloads?