David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):53-72 (2001)
I argue that in the seven “dogmas of the universal faith,” which are introduced in chapter XIV of the Theological-Political Treatise, Spinoza reinterprets the traditional view of a minimal credo required for salvation. The dogmas are dialectical propositions that are true insofar as they are practically useful. Instead of obtaining salvation for the soul, the dogmas aid in the preservation of the body, particularly through the regulation of religion within the state. I show that reading the dogmas in light of Spinoza’s method of interpreting Scripture is crucial to the understanding of their function in religion. In conclusion, I claim that the dogmas do not lead to the abolition of traditional religion, as some have claimed, but rather support the toleration of diverse religious practices
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Christian Laursen (2011). Blind Spots in the Toleration Literature. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):307-322.
Similar books and articles
Warren Zev Harvey (2012). Shlomo Pines on Maimonides, Spinoza, and Kant. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 20 (2):173-182.
Edward Halper (2004). Spinoza on the Political Value of Freedom of Religion. History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2):167-182.
James F. Harris (1973). Dogmas of “Two Dogmas”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):285-289.
Michael Della Rocca (2008). Spinoza. Routledge.
Paul A. Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas' -- All Bark and No Bite? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633-648.
Paul A. Gregory (2003). Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Paul Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas'--All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
Andrew Lugg (2012). W.V. Quine on Analyticity: “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” in Context. Dialogue 51 (2):231-246.
John McTaggart (1906). Some Dogmas of Religion. London: Edward Arnold Press.
P. Bloomfield (2007). Two Dogmas of Metaethics. Philosophical Studies 132 (3):439-466.
Alex John London (2007). Two Dogmas of Research Ethics and the Integrative Approach to Human-Subjects Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):99 – 116.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads40 ( #100,221 of 1,792,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #120,088 of 1,792,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?