Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (1):105-111 (1990)
|Abstract||A focus on the relation between sensation and the perceptual object in the philosophies of G H Mead and Maurice Merleau-Ponty points toward their shared views of perception as non-reductionistic and holistic, as inextricably tied to the active role of the sensible body, and as involving a new understanding of the nature of immediacy within experience. This essay explores these shared views.|
|Keywords||Epistemology immediacy perception sensation|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Taylor Carman (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the Mystery of Perception. Philosophy Compass 4 (4):630-638.
E. L. Mascall (1964). Perception and Sensation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64:259-272.
Ramon M. Lemos (1964). Sensation, Perception, and the Given. Ratio 6 (June):63-80.
Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1990). The Field of Perception and the Dimension of Human Activity: Mead and Merleau-Ponty. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):77-90.
Alphonso F. Lingis (1981). Sensations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (December):160-170.
Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1987). Peirce, Merleau-Ponty, and Perceptual Experience: A Kantian Heritage. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):33-42.
Pete Mandik (2005). Action-Oriented Representation. In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press.
Charles F. Wallraff (1953). On Immediacy and the Contemporary Dogma of Sense-Certainty. Journal of Philosophy 50 (January):29-38.
Paul E. Tibbetts (1974). Mead's Theory of the Act and Perception: Some Empirical Confirmations. Personalist 55:115-138.
Patrick Bourgeois (1990). Sensation, Perception and Immediacy. Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (1):105-111.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-07-07
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?