Strong, weak and functional equivalence in machine simulation
Philosophy of Science 41 (December):412-414 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Science Simulation Mackintosh, N Wilks, Y | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWendy S. Parker (2008). Computer Simulation Through an Error-Statistical Lens. Synthese 163 (3):371 - 384.
Johannes Lenhard (2006). Surprised by a Nanowire: Simulation, Control, and Understanding. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):605-616.
Eric Winsberg (2003). Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):105-125.
Jordi Fernández (2003). Explanation by Computer Simulation in Cognitive Science. Minds And Machines 13 (2):269-284.
François Recanati (2002). Varieties of Simulation. In Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.
Josef Perner (1994). The Necessity and Impossibility of Simulation. In Christopher Peacocke (ed.), Objectivity, Simulation, and the Unity of Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Russell Trenholme (1994). Analog Simulation. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):115-131.
Robert M. Gordon & Joe Cruz (2002). Simulation Theory. In L. Nagel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Macmillan.
A. Rosenberg & N. J. Mackintosh (1973). On Fodor's Distinction Between Strong and Weak Equivalence in Machine Simulation. Philosophy of Science 40 (March):118-120.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,118 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
