Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):206-207 (1997)
|Abstract||I take issue with Saunders & van Brakel's claim that neural processes play no interesting role in determining color categorizations. I distinguish an aspect of color categorization, namely, color discrimination, from other aspects. The law of trichromacy describes conditions under which physical properties cannot be discriminated in terms of color. Trichromacy is explained by properties of neural processes.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
P. Ross (2000). The Relativity of Color. Synthese 123 (1):105-130.
Mohan Matthen (2010). Color Experience: A Semantic Theory. In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. MIT Press.
Peter W. Ross (2012). Perceived Colors and Perceived Locations: A Problem for Color Subjectivism. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):125-138.
Kimberly Jameson (2010). Where in the World Color Survey is the Support for the Hering Primaries as the Basis for Color Categorization? In Jonathan D. Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. Mit Press.
Mohan P. Matthen (1999). The Disunity of Color. Philosophical Review 108 (1):47-84.
Peter W. Ross (2010). Fitting Color Into the Physical World. Philosophical Psychology 23 (5):575-599.
David M. Rosenthal (2001). Color, Mental Location, and the Visual Field. Consciousness And Cognition 10 (1):85-93.
Gary Hatfield (1992). Color Perception and Neural Encoding: Does Metameric Matching Entail a Loss of Information? Philosophy of Science Association 1992:492-504.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?