Graduate studies at Western
The Review of Metaphysics 43 (2):251 - 279 (1989)
|Abstract||Mistakes about necessity, possibility, counterpossibility and impossibility distort the notions of being and creation.1 Recently such errors cluster in the understanding of quantified modal logic (QML), a device that was for a while thought especially promising for metaphysics.2 Time has told a different story. The underlying modal platonism is gratuitous, without explanatory force and conflicts with the religion it is often used to explain. There are things to consider here that go beyond diagnosing mistakes.3..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. Peacocke (1997). Metaphysical Necessity: Understanding, Truth and Epistemology. Mind 106 (423):521-574.
Derek Ball (2011). Property Identities and Modal Arguments. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (13).
George Boolos (1993). The Logic of Provability. Cambridge University Press.
J. Hawthorne & G. Uzquiano (2011). How Many Angels Can Dance on the Point of a Needle? Transcendental Theology Meets Modal Metaphysics. Mind 120 (477):53-81.
Chris John Daly (2008). The Methodology of Genuine Modal Realism. Synthese 162 (1):37 - 52.
Richard Patterson (1995). Aristotle's Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #25,083 of 739,324 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,030 of 739,324 )
How can I increase my downloads?