David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Society 63 (3):283 - 309 (1999)
At least since the publication of Roman Rosdolsky's "The Making of Marx's Capital", the Grundrisse has been an essential reference for anyone wishing to demonstrate a significant dependence of Marx's political economy upon Hegelian "logic." Contrary to Rosdolsky's interpretation, however, the "Grundrisse" can in fact be read as the drama of Marx's escape from his Hegelian philosophical heritage. Hegel's "dialectical method" is not a method of logical argumentation, but a "method" of paralogical mystification. Marx's own attempts to construct "dialectical derivations" of economic categories in the "Grundrisse" lead him into theoretical culs-desac, and he is only able to make real progress in his economic investigations by precisely foregoing such adventures. The persistence, nonetheless, of certain characteristically Hegelian formulae—though, n. b., not characteristically Hegelian argumentational structures—in "Capital", and especially in the first chapter, is a function of the ontological peculiarity of Marx's initial object of inquiry, viz., money, and does not reflect any "methodological" choice. Marx's arguments in "Capital" are not "dialectical" but rather "transcendental" in nature, starting from given market phenomena (prices, profit, etc.) and working back to their conditions of possibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthew J. Smetona (2012). Marx's Inferential Commitment to Hegel's Idealism in the Grundrisse. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):351-372.
Tony Smith (1999). The Relevance of Systematic Dialectics to Marxian Thought: A Reply to Rosenthal. Historical Materialism 4 (1):215-240.
J. F. Humphrey (2010). Reflections on the Economic Crisis. The Transcendental Character of Money: An Exposition of Karl Marx’s Argument in the Grundrisse. Nordicum-Mediterraneum, Vol. 5, No. 1 (March 2010) 5 (1).
John L. Stanley (1997). Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Science and Society 61 (4):449 - 473.
Tony Smith (2000). On Rosenthal's "Escape" From Hegel. Science and Society 64 (4):489 - 496.
Tony Smith (1990). The Logic of Marx's Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms. State University of New York Press.
Roslyn Wallach Bologh (1979). Dialectical Phenomenology: Marx's Method. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Norman Levine (2012). Marx's Discourse with Hegel. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stanley Moore (1971). Marx and the Origin of Dialectical Materialism1. Inquiry 14 (1-4):420-429.
Sean Sayers (2007). Individual and Society in Marx and Hegel: Beyond the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. Science and Society 71 (1):84 - 102.
Mario Sáenz (2007). Living Labor in Marx. Radical Philosophy Review 10 (1):1-31.
Ulrich Steinvorth (1977). Marx's Theory of Value. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (4):385-396.
Thomas T. Sekine (2008). The Dialectic of Capital : An Unoist Interpretation. In Bertell Ollman & Tony Smith (eds.), Science and Society. Palgrave Macmillan 434 - 445.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads14 ( #268,118 of 1,934,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,687 of 1,934,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?