Social Philosophy and Policy 5 (01):1- (2009)
|Abstract||Is a government required or permitted to redistribute the gains and losses that differences in biol ogical endowments generate In particular, does the fact that individuals possess different biological endowments lead to unfair advantages within a market economy? These are questions on which so me people are apt to have strong intuitions and ready arguments. Egalitarians may say yes and argu e that as unearned, undeserved advantages and disadvantages, biological endowments are never fai r, and that the market simply exacerbates these inequities.1 Libertarians may say no, holding that th e possession of such endowments deprives no one of an entitlement and that any system but a mark et would deprive agents of the rights to their endowments.2 Biological endowments may well lead t o advantages or disadvantages on their view, but not to unfair ones|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Williams (2004). Equality, Ambition and Insurance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):131–150.
Michael Otsuka (2004). Equality, Ambition and Insurance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):151–166.
A. H. Martin & R. Simmat (1925). Some Psychological Tests Applied to Engineering Workshop Apprentices. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):57 – 69.
Ekkart Zimmermann (1990). On the Outcomes of Revolutions: Some Preliminary Considerations. Sociological Theory 8 (1):33-47.
Rolans Pierik & Robeyns Ingrid (2007). Resources Versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory. Political Studies 55 (1):133.
W. R. Jones (1980). Pious Endowments in Medieval Christianity and Islam. Diogenes 28 (109):23-36.
Adee Matan & Sidney Strauss (1998). Relations Between Innate Endowments, Cognitive Development, Domain Specificity, and a Taxonomy-Creator. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):584-584.
Alexander Rosenberg (2000). Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science, and Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Linda Barclay (2010). Disability, Respect and Justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):154-171.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,233 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,438 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?