The Paradox of Apeiron

Network Review (86):3-6 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay offers a broad historical exploration of the apeiron, the ancient principle of boundlessness and indeterminacy first brought to light by Anaximander in the 6th century BCE. Early Greek philosophy’s struggle with the apeiron and apeiron’s subsequent repression during the Renaissance and Enlightenment are noted. In the nineteenth century, apeiron is resurgent in science, art, and other fields—only to be repressed again with the early twentieth century rise of modernism. But with modernism's collapse into postmodernism, once again the apeiron comes to the fore. The conclusion reached is that the apeiron can be effectively contained only by consciously acknowledging and accepting it as part of the process of individuation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-16

Downloads
79 (#206,544)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven M. Rosen
College of Staten Island (CUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wholeness and the implicate order.David Bohm - 1980 - New York: Routledge.
Wholeness and the Implicate Order.David Bohm - 1980 - New York: Routledge.
Eye and Mind.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1964 - In The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, USA: Northwestern University Press. pp. 159-190.
Wholeness and the Implicate Order.David Bohm - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):303-305.

View all 13 references / Add more references