Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Steven M. Rosen (2004). The Paradox of Apeiron. Network Review: Journal of the Scientific and Medical Network (86):3-6.
Similar books and articles
This paper discusses Simpson's paradox and the problem of positive relevance in probabilistic causality. It is argued that Cartwright's solution to Simpson's paradox fails because it ignores one crucial form of the paradox. After clarifying different forms of the paradox, it is shown that any adequate solution to the paradox must allow a cause to be both a negative cause and a positive cause of..
No categories
Graham Priest (1994) has argued that the following paradoxes all have the same structure: Russell’s Paradox, Burali-Forti’s Paradox, Mirimanoff’s Paradox, König’s Paradox, Berry’s Paradox, Richard’s Paradox, the Liar and Liar Chain Paradoxes, the Knower and Knower Chain Paradoxes, and the Heterological Paradox. Their common structure is given by Russell’s Schema: there is a property φ and function δ such that..
No categories
No categories
No categories
No categories
No categories
As we saw in the Preface, pre-Socratic philosophy viewed nature in the raw as
apeiron, the Greek word meaning "limitless," "boundless" or "indeterminate. ...
A variation of Fitch’s Paradox is given, where no special rules of inference are assumed, only axioms. These axioms follow from the familiar assumptions which involve rules of inference. We show (by constructing a model) that by allowing that possibly the knower doesn’t know his own soundness (while still requiring he be sound), Fitch’s Paradox is avoided. Provided one is willing to admit that sound knowers may be ignorant of their own soundness, this might offer a way out of the paradox.
Discussion of Steven M. Rosen, The Paradox of Apeiron
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

