The social nature of engineering and its implications for risk taking
Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1) (2010)
| Abstract | Making decisions with an, often significant, element of risk seems to be an integral part of many of the projects of the diverse profession of engineering. Whether it be decisions about the design of products, manufacturing processes, public works, or developing technological solutions to environmental, social and global problems, risk taking seems inherent to the profession. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the topic and specifically to how our understanding of engineering as a distinctive profession might affect how we should make decisions under risk. This paper seeks to remedy this, firstly by offering a nuanced account of risk and then by considering how specific claims about our understanding of engineering as a social profession, with corresponding social values and obligations, should inform how we make decisions about risk in this context. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBeniamino T. Cenci Goga & Francesca Clementi (2002). Safety Assurance of Foods: Risk Management Depends on Good Science but It is Not a Scientific Activity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (3):303-313.
Michael Lightner & Erik Fisher (2011). Entering the Social Experiment: A Case for the Informed Consent of Graduate Engineering Students. Social Epistemology 23 (3):283-300.
Maria Paola Ferretti (forthcoming). Risk and Distributive Justice: The Case of Regulating New Technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Michael Davis (2009). Is Engineering a Profession Everywhere? Philosophia 37 (2).
Joseph R. Herkert (2001). Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):403-414.
J. S. Busby & M. Coeckelbergh (2003). The Social Ascription of Obligations to Engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):363-376.
Céline Kermisch (2012). Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102.
John Kadvany (1997). Varieties of Risk Representations. Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
N. Athanassoulis & A. Ross (2010). A Virtue Ethical Account of Making Decisions About Risk. Journal of Risk Research 13 (2):217.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-04-20Total downloads20 ( #62,418 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #7,600 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
