David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 75 (4):252-271 (2009)
In this article I construe Russell's definite description notation as a fragment of an "ideal language"– a language in which, as Russell puts it in the "Logical Atomism" lectures, "the words in a proposition correspond one by one with the components of the corresponding fact." Russell's notation – containing as it does variables, quantifiers and the identity sign – commits him to an ontology that is lavish indeed. It thus conflicts with the spirit of the theory of descriptions, which is developed in the service of ontological frugality (the elimination of denoting concepts, senses and non-existent objects). I make use of arguments derived from the Tractatus to show that an ideal language need not contain logical signs. I thus defend the spirit of the theory of descriptions while departing from its letter.
|Keywords||Russell ideal language Tractatus theory of descriptions Wittgenstein|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Edwin B. Allaire (1968). Relations and the Problem of Individuation. Philosophical Studies 19 (4):61 - 63.
D. M. Armstrong (1993). A World of States of Affairs. Philosophical Perspectives 7 (3):429-440.
J. L. Austin (1979). Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
Gustav Bergmann (1964). Logic and Reality. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
Gustav Bergmann (1960). Meaning and Existence. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pasquale Frascolla (1997). The Tractatus System of Arithmetic. Synthese 112 (3):353-378.
Max Rosenkrantz (2007). The King of France Restored. Metaphysica 8 (2):149-163.
Berit Brogaard (2007). Descriptions: Predicates or Quantifiers? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):117 – 136.
Kent Bach (2004). Descriptions: Points of Reference. In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Clarendon Press.
Stephen Schiffer (2005). Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions. Mind 114 (456):1135-1183.
Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Bernard Linsky (2009). Russell Vs. Frege on Definite Descriptions as Singular Terms. In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
Berit Brogaard (2010). Descriptions: An Annotated Bibliography. Oxford Annotated Bibliographies Online.
Added to index2009-11-26
Total downloads52 ( #37,115 of 1,410,046 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,795 of 1,410,046 )
How can I increase my downloads?