David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Contemporary discussions typically give somewhat sort shrift to the theory of judgment Descartes advances in the Fourth Meditation.' One reason for this relative neglect is presumably the prima facie implausibility of the theory. It sounds odd to say that, in believing something, one's mental affirmation is an act of free will, on a par with freely deciding what to do. In addition, Descartes advances the theory as a way to explain the possibility of human error, which doubtless strikes many as a rather esoteric undertaking. The need to explain error, moreover, arises because of the divine guarantee, and epistemic theodicy is a project unlikely to interest most contemporary readers. And because the theory of judgment postulates two mental..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Albena Azmanova (2012). The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. Columbia University Press.
Kathleen Wallace (1993). Reconstructing Judgment: Emotion and Moral Judgment. Hypatia 8 (3):61 - 83.
Christian List (2012). Judgment Aggregation: A Short Introduction. In U. Maki (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics. Elsevier
Brett Gaul (2004). Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
Scott Kimbrough (2005). Descartes on Physical Causes of Impaired Judgment. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:117-140.
Xialing Xie (2009). Aesthetic Judgment: The Power of the Mind in Understanding Confucianism. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):38-51.
Patrick McKee (2007). Toward an Epistemology of Wise Judgment. Philo 10 (2):136-148.
Michael Smith (2004). Ethics and the a Priori: Selected Essays on Moral Psychology and Meta-Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Rico Vitz (2010). Descartes and the Question of Direct Doxastic Voluntarism. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:107-21.
Justus Buchler (1979). Toward a General Theory of Human Judgment. Dover Publications.
David Pole (1961). Conditions of Rational Inquiry. [London]University of London, Athlone Press.
Steven A. Sloman, Philip M. Fernbach & Scott Ewing (2012). A Causal Model of Intentionality Judgment. Mind and Language 27 (2):154-180.
R. Lanier Anderson (2008). Review: Comments on Wayne Martin, Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):91-108.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads78 ( #27,186 of 1,699,567 )
Recent downloads (6 months)48 ( #8,584 of 1,699,567 )
How can I increase my downloads?