Der Grundsatz der Menschenwürde und das Problem des „Zwecks an-sich“

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 94 (4):421-433 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the current theoretical discourse, human dignity as it is enshrined in the German Basic Law, is often interpreted as a special „right to non-instrumentalization“ which overturns any other human right. This interpretation usually refers to Kant’s concept of human dignity, according to which any person is an “end-in-itself”. By discussing the different possibilities on how to understand this idea, I want to point out that none of possible interpretations of Kant’s concept can give good reasons for an understanding of human dignity as a special “right to non-instrumentalization”. Instead I propose to understand human dignity as the principle of and the reason for the absolute inviolability of basic human rights.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Menschenwürde und.Frank Dietrich - 2012 - In Jan C. Joerden (ed.), Menschenwürde in der Medizin: quo vadis? Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Eigenverantwortung im Gesundheitsrecht.Stefan Huster - 2010 - Ethik in der Medizin 22 (3):289-299.
State and Self-Consciousness (in Serbo-Croatian).Wolfgang Wieland - 1990 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 37:935-946.
Der erste Grundsatz und die Bildlehre.Katsuaki Okada - 1997 - Fichte-Studien 10:127-141.
Das Verhältnis von Begriff und Grundsatz im apriorischen Gottesbeweis.Joachim Kopper - 1973 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 27 (1):3 - 23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-07

Downloads
10 (#1,123,760)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references