Ethics and Education 7 (1):59 - 73 (2012)
|Abstract||Robin Barrow claims in his ?Moral education's modest agenda? that ?the task of moral education is to develop understanding, at the lowest level, of the expectations of society and, at the highest level, of the nature of morality???[that is, that moral education] should go on to develop understanding, not of a particular social code, but of the nature of morality ? of the principles that provide the framework within which practical decisions have to be made? [Barrow, R. 2006. Moral education's modest agenda. Ethics and Education 1, no. 1: 3?13.]. Barrow's words are noteworthy not only because he sets out to define the ?modest? agenda of moral education in terms of principles, but also because he asserts that education is important for teaching students to understand morality in such terms. However, even though he is arguing that understanding morality is important in terms of principles, he says little about their function or status, or how we cultivate ourselves so that we act in agreement with and are motivated by the principles of practical reason. In this article I therefore discuss two distinctive features of human beings and offer a Kantian notion of morality as a response to Barrow's development of an understanding of morality in terms of principles. I argue that the principles Kant suggests are constitutive of action, and that we both develop our understanding and also value our humanity when we act in agreement with and are motivated by the suggested principles, and cultivate our predispositions (technical, pragmatic and moral). Moreover, I argue that we reach the goal of ?a progressive organization of citizens of the earth into and toward the species as a system that is cosmopolitically united? [Kant, I. 2006b. Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. Trans. Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.] when we, inter alia, value our humanity and comply with the principles of practical reason, in practice|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Klas Roth (2011). Principles of the Unification of Our Agency. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):283-297.
Pat White (1980). Political Education and Moral Education or Bringing Up Children to Be Decent Members of Society. Journal of Moral Education 9 (3):147-155.
Derek Wright (1983). Religious Education From the Perspective of Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 12 (2):111-115.
John Wilson (1981). Motivation and Methodology in Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 10 (2):85-94.
Chris W. Surprenant (2010). Kant's Contribution to Moral Education: The Relevance of Catechistics. Journal of Moral Education 39 (2):165-174.
Michael Martin (1986). Science Education and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 15 (2):99-108.
Nancy Bouchard & Ronald W. Morris (2012). Ethics Education Seen Through the Lens of Habermas's Conception of Practical Reason: The Québec Education Program. Journal of Moral Education 41 (2):171-187.
Robin Barrow (2006). Moral Education's Modest Agenda. Ethics and Education 1 (1):3-13.
Norman Dale Norris (2004). The Promise and Failure of Progressive Education. Scarecroweducation.
Robin Barrow (1986). Socrates Was a Human Being A Plea for Transcultural Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 15 (1):50-57.
Graham Haydon (2009). Reason and Virtues: The Paradox of R. S. Peters on Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):173-188.
Dung Hue Doan (2005). Moral Education or Political Education in the Vietnamese Educational System? Journal of Moral Education 34 (4):451-463.
Ben Spiecker (1992). Sexual Education and Morality. Journal of Moral Education 21 (1):67-76.
R. J. Royce (1984). R. S. Peters and Moral Education, 2: Moral Education in Practice. Journal of Moral Education 13 (1):9-16.
Added to index2012-06-01
Total downloads2 ( #232,316 of 549,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,010 )
How can I increase my downloads?