David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):469 - 493 (2004)
In this paper I discuss the relation between various properties that have been regarded as important for determining whether or not a belief constitutes a piece of knowledge: its stability, strength and sensitivity to truth, as well as the strength of the epistemic position in which the subject is with respect to this belief. Attempts to explicate the relevant concepts more formally with the help of systems of spheres of possible worlds (à la Lewis and Grove) must take care to keep apart the very different roles that systems of spheres can play. Nozicks sensitivity account turns out to be closer to the stability analysis of knowledge (versions of which I identify in Plato, Descartes, Klein and Lehrer) than one might have suspected.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Stewart Cohen (1988). How to Be a Fallibilist. Philosophical Perspectives 2:91-123.
Keith DeRose (1995). Solving the Skeptical Problem. Philosophical Review 104 (1):1-52.
René Descartes (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Robert J. Fogelin (1994). Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kelly Becker (2009). Margins for Error and Sensitivity: What Nozick Might Have Said. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 24 (1):17-31.
Lionel Faccenda & Nathalie Pantaléon (2011). Analysis of the Relationships Between Sensitivity to Injustice, Principles of Justice and Belief in a Just World. Journal of Moral Education 40 (4):491-511.
Mark Alfano (2009). Sensitivity Theory and the Individuation of Belief-Formation Methods. Erkenntnis 70 (2):271 - 281.
Keith E. Yandell (2005). Some Reflections on Religious Knowledge. Sophia 44 (1):25-52.
Jonathan Schaffer (2008). The Contrast-Sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions. Social Epistemology 22 (3):235-245.
Hamid Vahid (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sven Bernecker (2012). Sensitivity, Safety, and Closure. Acta Analytica 27 (4):367-381.
Lydia Mechtenberg (2004). The Stability Theory of Knowledge and Belief Revision: Comments on Rott. Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):495 - 507.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #88,243 of 1,100,752 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #34,285 of 1,100,752 )
How can I increase my downloads?