David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 2 (6):910–927 (2007)
(1) Every miner went to a meeting. It seems that (1) can mean either that there was one meeting that every miner went to, or that every miner went to at least one meeting with no guarantee that they all went to the same meeting. In the language of ﬁrst-order logic we can represent these two readings as a matter of the universal and existential quantiﬁers having diﬀerent scope with respect to each other.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Glanzberg (2007). Definite Descriptions and Quantifier Scope: Some Mates Cases Reconsidered. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3 (2):133-158.
Saul A. Kripke (2005). Russell's Notion of Scope. Mind 114 (456):1005-1037.
Daniel Rothschild (2007). Presuppositions and Scope. Journal of Philosophy 104 (2):71-106.
Delia Graff Fara (2003). Desires, Scope, and Tense. Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):141-164.
ST Kuhn (2000). Embedded Definite Descriptions: Russellian Analysis and Semantic Puzzles. Mind 109 (435):443-454.
Adrian Brasoveanu, Structured Anaphora to Quantifier Domains: A Unified Account of Quantificational & Modal Subordination and Exceptional Wide Scope.
R. C. Miner (2008). What Does Obligation Add to Virtue-Descriptions? Some Uses of Anscombe's Law/Game Analogy. Christian Bioethics 14 (2):165-174.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #87,262 of 1,098,796 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #174,441 of 1,098,796 )
How can I increase my downloads?