Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (2):175-195 (1991)
|Abstract||This article explores and attempts to resolve some issues that arise when psychoanalytic explanations are construed as a type of historical or narrative explanation. The chief problem is this: If one rejects the claim of narratives to verisimilitude, this appears to divorce the notion of explanation from that of truth. The author examines, in particular, Donald Spence's attempt to deal with the relation of narrative explanations and truth. In his critique of Spence's distinction between narrative truth and historical truth, the author develops some suggestions regarding the role of truth in narrative explanations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
By Nic Damnjanovic (2005). Deflationism and the Success Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):53–67.
Donald Davidson (2005). Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press.
Mary B. Williams (1986). The Logical Skeleton of Darwin's Historical Methodology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:514 - 521.
Alphonso Lingis (2011). Truth in Reconciliation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):239-243.
J. E. Malpas (1992). Donald Davidson and the Mirror of Meaning: Holism, Truth, Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Fumerton (2010). Partnership in Truth-Making. Topoi 29 (2):91-98.
Wilhelm Dancă (ed.) (2008). Truth and Morality: The Role of Truth in Public Life. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Paul Thagard (2007). Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of Science 74 (1):28-47.
Björn Eriksson (2005). Understanding Narrative Explanation. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):317-344.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 733,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 733,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?