Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):91-114 (2000)
|Abstract||An appreciation of Hume's psychology of object identity allows us to recognize certain tensions in his discussion of the origin of our belief in personal identity-tensions which have gone largely unnoticed in the secondary literature. This will serve to provide a new solution to the problem of explaining why Hume finds that discussion of personal identity so problematic when he famously disavows it in the Appendix to the Treatise. It turns out that the two psychological mechanisms which respectively generate the ideas of object and of personal identity are mutually incompatible. It is this sort of conflict within Hume's introspective or subjectivist psychology which is the source of his worry|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Godfrey N. A. Vesey (1973). Personal Identity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press,.
E. Furberg (2012). Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
John Perry (ed.) (1975). Personal Identity. University of California Press.
Galen Strawson (2011). The Evident Connexion: Hume on Personal Identity. Oxford University Press.
Harold W. Noonan (1989). Personal Identity. Routledge.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2008). Human Beings Have No Identical Self. Proceedings of the 20th Conference of All Orissa Philosophy Association (20):198-210.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2005). Hume’s Discussion on the Personal Identity. Bihar Jounal of Philosophical Research (00):00.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,847 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,756 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?