Hypatia 19 (1):142-161 (2004)
|Abstract||: Philosophical naturalism is ambiguous between conjoining philosophy with science or with nature understood scientifically. Reconciliation of this ambiguity is necessary but rarely attempted. Feminist science studies often endorse the former naturalism but criticize the second. Karen Barad's agential realism, however, constructively reconciles both senses. Barad then challenges traditional metaphysical naturalisms as not adequately accountable to science. She also contributes distinctively to feminist reinterpretations of objectivity as agential responsibility, and of agency as embodied, worldly, and intra-active|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sharon Crasnow (2008). Feminist Philosophy of Science: 'Standpoint' and Knowledge. Science and Education 17 (10):1089-1110.
Kirsten Campbell (2004). The Promise of Feminist Reflexivities: Developing Donna Haraway's Project for Feminist Science Studies. Hypatia 19 (1):162-182.
Jane Duran (1998). Philosophies of Science/Feminist Theories. Westview Press.
J. P. Moreland (1997). Naturalism and Libertarian Agency. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):353-383.
Sue V. Rosser (1987). Feminist Scholarship in the Sciences: Where Are We Now and When Can We Expect A Theoretical Breakthrough? Hypatia 2 (3):5 - 17.
Federica Timeto (2011). Diffracting the Rays of Technoscience: A Situated Critique of Representation. Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):151-167.
Sharyn Clough (2004). Having It All: Naturalized Normativity in Feminist Science Studies. Hypatia 19 (1):102-118.
Karen Barad (2006). Posthumanist Performativity : Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. In Deborah Orr (ed.), Belief, Bodies, and Being: Feminist Reflections on Embodiment. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #42,452 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?