David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 28 (2):185-200 (2006)
The humanity-nature divide is a modern Western construction based on the notion that matter (nature) is dead, while consciousness (humanity) is alive, rational, and positioned to use matter (nature) to achieve its ends. In contrast, in the world views of the indigenous Maμori of New Zealand and Aborigines of Australia, nature is not separate from humanity and all is infused with consciousness. The ecofeminist and Goddess movements which emerged in the last decades of the twentieth-century, share with many indigenous religions the perception that all of nature is alive and that human beings must respect other beings within the web of life. Yet these are postmodern rather than premodern movements with an explicit critique of the assumptions of modernity. Process philosophy, especially when understood through the “feminist process paradigm” proposed here, is a postmodern philosophical system that affirms the insights of indigenous peoples, as well as Goddess and ecofeminists, that humanity must situate itself within the web of life. At the same time, process philosophy provides the tools for reconciling “premodern” insights with the findings (but not the assumptions) of modern science. Each of these resources can help us to provide alternatives to the humanity-nature divide
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Carol P. Crist & Kathryn Roundtree (2006). Humanity in the Web of Life. Environmental Ethics 28 (2):185-200.
Barbara Currier Bell (1981). Humanity in Nature: Toward a Fresh Approach. Environmental Ethics 3 (3):245-257.
Dmitry Shlapentokh (2001). Cosmism in European Thought. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:497-546.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2001). Analogical Extension and Analogical Implication in Environmental Moral Philosophy. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):149-158.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2002). A Sense of Ecological Humanity. Social Philosophy Today 18:125-136.
Nathan Kowalsky (2006). Following Human Nature. Environmental Ethics 28 (2):165-183.
Robert Cummings Neville (2001). Humanity and the Natural World. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:259-264.
Fidel Gutiérrez Vivanco (2008). La Identidad, la Diferencia y la Integración de la Humanidad. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 18:141-147.
Klaus M. Meyer-Abich (1979). Toward a Practical Philosophy of Nature. Environmental Ethics 1 (4):293-308.
Kerry Brady & Brian Swimme (2012). Nature and Eros: An Educational Process for Engaging With a Living Universe. World Futures 68 (2):112 - 121.
Mark Painter (2001). Language and Moral Justification in Pre-Reformation Philosophy. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:399-421.
Chung-Ying Cheng (2012). World Humanities and Self-Reflection of Humanity: A Confucian-Neo-Confucian Perspective. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (4):476-494.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads1 ( #437,916 of 1,100,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,727 of 1,100,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?