I. the durability of impossible objects

Inquiry 19 (1-4):247 – 251 (1976)
Meinong's theory of impossible objects is defended against a number of objections, in particular against Karel Lambert's argument (see Impossible Objects?, Inquiry, Vol. 17 [1974], pp. 303?14) that no objects are impossible
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201747608601802
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Karel Lambert (1974). Impossible Objects. Inquiry 17 (1-4):303 – 314.
R. Routley (1980). Exploring Meinong's Jungle. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21:480.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

15 ( #171,478 of 1,724,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #210,951 of 1,724,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.