David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 3 (3):237-244 (1981)
Donald C. Lee’s “On the Marxian View of the Relationship between Man and Nature” is one of a number of recent attempts to interpret Marxian doctrine in an environmentally attractive way. I argue that Lee does not really succeed, that many of the assumptions of the Marxian theory which Lee still retains are in conflict with a satisfactory environmental ethic and with the current process of revision of theconventional ethic. The central doctrine Lee expounds, the superficially attractive Marxian thesis of unity between man and nature, is attractive only because the real basis of this “unity”-the transformation of nature into a human expression-is not spelled out. Such unity-through-transformation is incompatible with retention and respect for untransformed nature, i.e., wilderness. The Marxian position Lee expoundsis environmentally unsatisfactory in many other ways also: it continues to laud the “objectification” of nature, retains a highly homocentric view of man’s relation to nature, and encourages human hubris. Other specific elements of the position Lee presents which are in conflict with environmentalism are the doctrine of the historical necessity of the capitalist stage, with its acquiescence in the destructive technology of advanced capitalism, the chauvinistic Marxian material on animals appealed to by Lee, and the treatment of liberation as the maximization of leisure and the minimization of bread labor. To obtain an environmentally sound noncapitalist society it is necessary to discard many central elements of Marxian doctrine and to move beyond Marx
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Karl Marx (1913). The Poverty of Philosophy. Prometheus Books.
Shuguang Zhang (2007). Historicity and the Modern Situation of Human Existence: A Reinterpretation of the Views of Karl Marx. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):70-83.
Peter Dickens (1996). Reconstructing Nature: Alienation, Emancipation, and the Division of Labour. Routledge.
Hwa Yol Jung (1983). Marxism, Ecology, and Technology. Environmental Ethics 5 (2):169-171.
Justin P. Holt (2009). Karl Marx's Philosophy of Nature, Action and Society: A New Analysis. Cambridge Scholars.
A. K. Saran (1963). The Marxian Theory of Social Change. Inquiry 6 (1-4):70 – 128.
Donald C. Lee (1982). Toward a Marxian Ecological Ethic: A Response to Two Critics. Environmental Ethics 4 (4):339-343.
Charles Tolman (1981). Karl Marx, Alienation, and the Mastery of Nature. Environmental Ethics 3 (1):63-74.
Donald C. Lee (1980). On the Marxian View of the Relationship Between Man and Nature. Environmental Ethics 2 (1):3-16.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #221,840 of 1,932,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,114 of 1,932,488 )
How can I increase my downloads?