How to change it: Modes of engagement, rationality, and stance voluntarism

Synthese 178 (1):7-17 (2011)
Abstract
We have three goals in this paper. First, we outline an ontology of stance, and explain the role that modes of engagement and styles of reasoning play in the characterization of a stance. Second, we argue that we do enjoy a degree of control over the modes of engagement and styles of reasoning we adopt. Third, we contend that maximizing one’s prospects for change (within the framework of other constraints, e.g., beliefs, one has) also maximizes one’s rationality.
Keywords Rationality  Stance  Voluntarism  van Fraassen
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,088
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
T. Kuhn (1970). Reflections on My Critics In I. LAKATOS & A. MUSGROVE, Eds. In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. 231--278.

View all 15 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-04-20

Total downloads

36 ( #51,757 of 1,101,955 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

11 ( #21,892 of 1,101,955 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.