Liberalism and the Changing Character of the Criminal Law: Response to Ashworth and Zedner [Book Review]
Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):59-65 (2008)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Jacobs (2011). Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
C. M. V. Clarkson (2008). Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):131-135.
Michael D. Bayles (1982). Character, Purpose, and Criminal Responsibility. Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5 - 20.
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Andrew Ashworth (2011). Attempts. In John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Katrina Sifferd (2012). Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment. In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press.
Stuart P. Green (2008). Rationing Criminal Procedure: A Comment on Ashworth and Zedner. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):53-58.
Andrew Ashworth & Lucia Zedner (2008). Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):21-51.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads4 ( #188,845 of 722,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,645 of 722,776 )
How can I increase my downloads?