Objective Bayesianism defended?

Metascience 21 (1):193-196 (2012)
Abstract
This is a review of Jon Williamson's 'In Defence of Objective Bayesianism'.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Alan Hájek (2005). Scotching Dutch Books? Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):139–151.
Edwin T. Jaynes (1973). The Well-Posed Problem. Foundations of Physics 3 (4):477-493.

View all 12 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan (2010). Two Dogmas of Strong Objective Bayesianism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
J. Williamson (2012). Calibration and Convexity: Response to Gregory Wheeler. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):851-857.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-09

Total downloads

29 ( #50,844 of 1,089,063 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,063 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.