Permissibility and violable rules
Philosophia 36 (3):367-374 (2008)
| Abstract | From a logical point of view, permissibility can be reduced to possibility by introducing demands which can be met. The alleged reduction is circular from a philosophical perspective, however, because demands are fundamentally deontic. This paper solves this problem by replacing demands which can be met with rules which can be satisfied and violated. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJacob Paroush (1997). Order Relations Among Efficient Decision Rules. Theory and Decision 43 (3):209-218.
John Earman (2008). Superselection Rules for Philosophers. Erkenntnis 69 (3):377 - 414.
Erik C. W. Krabbe (1985). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese 63 (3):295 - 328.
Erick C. W. Krabbe (1984). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese 58 (2):295 - 328.
Mary Kate Mcgowan (2004). Conversational Exercitives: Something Else We Do with Our Words. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (1):93-111.
Frank Hindriks (2009). Constitutive Rules, Language, and Ontology. Erkenntnis 71 (2):253 - 275.
Thomas Kroedel (2012). The Lottery Paradox, Epistemic Justification and Permissibility. Analysis 72 (1):57-60.
Matthew Hanser (2005). Permissibility and Practical Inference. Ethics 115 (3):443-470.
Jakob Elster (2012). Scanlon on Permissibility and Double Effect. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):75-102.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 550,854 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,854 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
