Response to: divine responsibility without divine freedom [Book Review]

Michael Bergmann and Jan Cover summarize the essence of their paper as follows: "We argue that divine responsibility is sufficient for divine thankworthiness and consistent with the absence of divine freedom. We do this while insisting on the view that both freedom and responsibility are incompatible with causal determinism." In this response I argue that while it makes sense for believers to be thankful that God exists, it makes no sense for them to thank him for doing the best act he can, given the circumstances
Keywords Brute necessity  Freedom  Perfectly good  Responsible  Thankworthy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/25652855
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
William Rowe (2002). Can God Be Free? Faith and Philosophy 19 (4):405-424.
William Rowe (2000). The Metaphysics of Freedom. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (3):425-446.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

65 ( #50,523 of 1,725,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #167,246 of 1,725,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.