Graduate studies at Western
Avant 3 (1):133-144 (2012)
|Abstract||There is a problem of representation and an apparatus of representations that was devised to solve this problem. This paper has two purposes. First, it will show why the problem of representation outstrips the apparatus of representations in the sense that the problem survives the demise of the apparatus. Secondly, it will argue that the question of whether cognition does or not involve representations is a poorly defined question, and far too crude to be helpful in understanding the nature of cognitive processes|
|Keywords||action normativity representation cognition intentionality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Dietrich & A. Markman (2003). Discrete Thoughts: Why Cognition Must Use Discrete Representations. Mind and Language 18 (1):95-119.
Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Corrado Sinigaglia (forthcoming). Intention and Motor Representation in Purposive Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Shaun Gallagher (2008). Are Minimal Representations Still Representations? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):351 – 369.
Uriah Kriegel (2007). Intentional Inexistence and Phenomenal Intentionality. Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):307-340.
Marco Mirolli (2012). Representations in Dynamical Embodied Agents: Re-Analyzing a Minimally Cognitive Model Agent. Cognitive Science 36 (5):870-895.
Gregg H. Rosenberg & Michael L. Anderson, Content and Action: The Guidance Theory of Representation.
Patrick Anselme & Robert M. French (1999). Interactively Converging on Context-Sensitive Representations: A Solution to the Frame Problem. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 53 (209):365-385.
Ingar Brinck & G. (1999). Representation and Self-Awareness in Intentional Agents. Synthese 118 (1):89-104.
Glenn Carruthers (2008). Types of Body Representation and the Sense of Embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1302):1316.
Lawrence A. Shapiro (1997). Junk Representations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):345-361.
Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (2009). What Does the Frame Problem Tell Us About Moral Normativity? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (1):25 - 51.
Mark Rowlands (2006). The Normativity of Action. Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):401-416.
Added to index2012-10-06
Total downloads21 ( #65,392 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,222 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?