David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):561-566 (1993)
Stove attempts to undermine Hume's argument on induction by denying Hume the claim that induction presupposes the uniformity of nature. I argue that Stove's attack on Hume's argument fails. *A paper from which the present piece was derived was read at the Hume Symposium. Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, in July 1990, where George Couvalis and David Gauthier made helpful criticisms of my argument.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Giaquinto (1987). Book Review:The Rationality of Induction D. C. Stove. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 54 (4):612-.
David Miller (1988). The Rationality of Induction By D. C. Stove Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986, 231 Pp., £22.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy 63 (244):286-.
D. C. Stove (1976). Hume, Induction, and the Irish. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):140 – 147.
D. Stove (1965). Hume, Probability, and Induction. Philosophical Review 74 (2):160-177.
D. C. Stove (1986). The Rationality of Induction. Oxford University Press.
Louis E. Loeb (2006). Psychology, Epistemology, and Skepticism in Hume's Argument About Induction. Synthese 152 (3):321 - 338.
Scott Campbell & James Franklin (2004). Randomness and the Justification of Induction. Synthese 138 (1):79 - 99.
Andrew Pickin (2006). An Argument By Stove Against Inductive Scepticism. Dissertation, University of Cambridge
Bipin Indurkhya (1990). Some Remarks on the Rationality of Induction. Synthese 85 (1):95 - 114.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #67,347 of 1,004,042 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,042 )
How can I increase my downloads?