Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Mark Rowlands (2002). Two Dogmas of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):158-80.
Similar books and articles
In recent philosophy of mind, it is often assumed that consciousness and self-consciousness are two separate phenomena. In this paper, I argue that this is not quite right. The argument proceeds in two phases. First, I draw a distinction between (i) being self-conscious of a thought that p and (ii) self-consciously thinking that p. I call the former transitive self-consciousness and the latter intransitive self-consciousness. I then argue that consciousness does depend on intransitive self-consciousness, and that the common reasons for denying the dependence of consciousness upon self-consciousness apply only to transitive self-consciousness.
Discussion of Mark Rowlands, Two dogmas of consciousness
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

