The Instrumentalist's New Clothes

Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1200-1211 (2011)
Abstract
This paper develops a new version of instrumentalism, in light of progress in the realism debate in recent decades, and thereby defends the view that instrumentalism remains a viable philosophical position on science. The key idea is that talk of unobservable objects should be taken literally only when those objects are assigned properties (or described in terms of analogies involving things) with which we are experientially (or otherwise) acquainted. This is derivative from the instrumentalist tradition in so far as the distinction between unobservable and observable is taken to have significance with respect to meaning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,337
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
J. Ladyman (1998). What is Structural Realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.
Bertrand Russell (1953). The Cult of 'Common Usage'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (12):303-307.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Adam Leite (2007). Epistemic Instrumentalism and Reasons for Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):456-464.
Andre Kukla (1992). On the Coherence of Instrumentalism. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):492-497.
Towfic Shomar (2008). Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39 (2):321 - 349.
Steve Fuller (1994). Retrieving the Point of the Realism-Instrumentalism Debate: Mach Vs. Planck on Science Education Policy. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:200 - 208.
Robin Findlay Hendry (2001). Are Realism and Instrumentalism Methodologically Indifferent? Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S25-.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-26

Total downloads

79 ( #15,795 of 1,096,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #10,246 of 1,096,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.